Short Sentences

Don’t: Cram too much information into a single sentence

Complex ideas do not require complex sentences. Academics, especially in the field of law, long embraced the idea that traditional academic language is somehow more precise than everyday language. The more incomprehensible to the uninitiated, the better. Opposition to this erroneous idea led to the creation of the plain language movement (also called the plain English movement) in consumer law.1 In defending the movement, Carl Felsenfeld, Professor Emeritus of Law at Fordham University, differentiates between technical writing and bad writing: “By just bad writing, I mean that traditional form of lawyer-like expression that has nothing to do with technical concepts. It is a manner of speech that lawyers learn.” Among his examples of bad writing, he notes that “sentences are simply longer than they have to be.”2

Although lawyers are the most notorious violators of the principles of plain language, they are certainly not the only ones. Concise writing does not mean cramming as much information as possible into one long, droning sentence. It means making your point succinctly and then moving on to make the next point. Even if you think long, complex sentences make you sound smarter, they don’t help your readers understand your message.

Do: Use short, clear sentences to present one or two ideas at a time

Periods are your friends. More importantly, they are your readers’ friends. Periods allow for the reader to pause and consider the information you have just presented before moving on to the next piece of information. Long sentences that present multiple ideas are more likely to confuse or distract some readers. Short sentences are simply easier to read.

However, this does not mean that you should write only simple sentences (defined by The Chicago Manual of Style Online as consisting “of a single independent clause with no dependent clause”3). Doing so would be mind-numbingly boring, and varying both sentence style and length helps to hold your readers’ attention. But when a sentence feels complicated and confusing, splitting into two (or even three) shorter sentences often fixes the problem.

To stay up to date with new content, follow Uplift Editing on Twitter.

  1. Carl Felsenfeld, “The Plain English Movement in the United States,” Canadian Business Law Journal 6 (1981–1982): 408–411, https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1475&context=faculty_scholarship.
  2. Felsenfeld, “Plain English Movement,”412.
  3. Chicago Manual of Style Online, 17th ed., s.v. “5.217: Simple sentence,” accessed August 18, 2020, https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/book/ed17/part2/ch05/psec217.html.